重要通知：2020年GMAT考试《GMAT语文》每日一练（3）

各位要参加2020年GMAT考试的小伙伴们注意啦！今天帮考网要给各位小伙伴分享2020年GMAT考试《GMAT语文》的每日一练，感兴趣的小伙伴赶快来看看哦！

As one who has always believed that truth is our nation’s surest weapon in the propaganda war against our foes, I am distressed by reports of “disinformation” campaigns by American intelligence agents in Western Europe. In a disinformation campaign, untruths are disseminated through gullible local journalists in order to damage the interests of our enemies and protect our own. Those who defend this practice say that lying is necessary to counter Soviet disinformation campaigns aimed at damaging America’s political interests. These apologists contend that one must fight fire with fire. I would point out to the apologists that the fire department finds water more effective.

1. The author of the passage above bases his conclusion on which of the following?

(A) A circular definition of “disinformation”.

(B) An example of the ineffectiveness of lying as a weapon in the propaganda war.

(C) An analogy between truth and water.

(D) An appeal to the authority of the fire department.

(E) An attack on the character of American intelligence agents in Western Europe.

2. The author’s main point is that

(A) although disinformation campaigns may be effective, they are unacceptable on ethical grounds.

(B) America’s moral standing in the world depends on its adherence to the truth.

(C) the temporary political gains produced by disinformation campaigns generally give way to long-term losses.

(D) Soviet disinformation campaigns have done little to damage America’s standing in Europe.

(E) disinformation campaigns do not effectively serve the political interests of the United States.

3. Are you still reading the other newspaper in town? Did you know that the Daily Bugle is owned by an out-of-town business syndicate that couldn’t care less about the people of Gotham City? Read the Daily Clarion, the only real voice of the people of Gotham City!Which of the following most directly refutes the argument raised in the advertisement above?

(A) Over half of the advertising revenues of the Daily Clarion come from firms whose headquarters are located outside of Gotham City.

(B) The Daily Clarion usually devotes more of its pages to out-of-town news than does the Daily Bugle.

(C) Nearly 40 percent of the readers of the Daily Clarion reside outside the limits of Gotham City.

(D) The editor-in-chief and all the other members of the editorial staff of the Daily Bugle have lived and worked in Gotham City for ten years or more.

(E) The Daily Bugle has been published in Gotham City for a longer time than has the Daily Clarion.

The earth’s resources are being depleted much too fast. To correct this, the United States must keep its resource consumption at present levels for many years to come.

4. The argument above depends on which of the following assumptions?

(A) Per capita resource consumption in the United States is at an all-time high.

(B) The United States wastes resources.

(C) The United States uses more resources than any other country.

(D) The United States imports most of the resources it uses.

(E) Curbing U.S. resource consumption will significantly retard world resource depletion.

5. Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument above?

(A) New resource deposits are constantly being discovered.

(B) The United States consumes one-third of all resources used in the world.

(C) Other countries need economic development more than the United States does.

(D) Other countries have agreed to hold their resource consumption at present levels.

(E) The United States has been conserving resources for several years.

6. Alba: I don’t intend to vote for Senator Frank in the next election. She is not a strong supporter of the war against crime.

Tam: But Senator Frank sponsored the latest anticrime law passed by the Senate.

Alba: If Senator Frank sponsored it, it can’t be a very strong anticrime law.

Which of the following identifies the most serious logical flaw in Alba’s reasoning?

(A) The facts she presents do not support her conclusion that Senator Frank is soft on crime.

(B) She assumes without proof that crime is the most important issue in the upcoming election.

(C) She argues in a circle, using an unsupported assertion to dismiss conflicting evidence.

(D) She attacks Senator Frank on personal grounds rather than on he merit as a political leader.

(E) In deciding not to vote for Senator Frank, she fails to consider issues other than crime.

好了，以上就是2020年GMAT考试《GMAT语文》每日一练（3）的全部内容了，如果各位小伙伴还有不明白的地方，可以进入帮考网咨询了解哦！